Home arrow European Grand Jury
S'INSCRIRE
BECOME FREE REGISTRED CLICK HERE!
Select your language
FrenchEnglish
Statistics
Members: 3510
News: 207
WebLinks: 19
Visitors: 888230
Home
Contact us
Terms & conditions
user identification
Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password??
No account yet? Create one
Grand Jury Européen
European Grand Jury
Permanent members
Tasting reports
We have 6 guests online
Archive
Syndicate
The European Grand Jury Print E-mail
Written by François Mauss   
Set up by François Mauss in 1996, the GJE wishes to see itself as an alternative way of classifying the great wines of the world compared to the individual notes
of the best critics worldwide, particularly the English and Americans from whom GJE has adopted the method of scoring out of 100 points to facilitate international comparisons.

Its method: regularly bring together at least 12 of its permanent members, from at least 6 different countries of the European Union (and Switzerland) in order to have them blind taste a maximum of 68 wines in two daily 3-hour session, under strict legal control.

IIn the spirit of complete independence, the GJE acquires the wines on the market or from the producers.
A non-profit making association incorporated under Luxembourg law (ASBL), the GJE operates thanks to generosity of its partners:

British Airways  - Cave sa - Country-Club de Genève - Dolia SA - Eldor Corporation -
Fontanella SpA - Le Creuset-Screwpull - MAC hoffmann & Co - Restaurant Laurent
SanPellegrino- Vino e Finanza - Zalto
Hôtels :
Albert 1er (Chamonix) - Balzac et George V (Paris) - Bauer Palace (Venise)
La Perla (Corvara) - Loisium hötel (Langenlois) Parc Hyatt (Milan)  - Tombolo (Bolgheri)
Villa d’Este (Como) - Grand Hyatt – Raffles – Shangri Là (Singapore)

THE PERMANENT MEMBERS OF THE GJE

Austria
Peter Moser (editor, journalist, magazine Falstaff)

Belgium
Herwig Janssen (great wine lover)

France
Eric Beaumard (manager Restaurant le V,  Hotel Georges V)
Michel Bettane (wine writer, journalist “Le Monde” France)
Philippe Bourguignon (manager, restaurant Le Laurent)
Didier Bureau (manager, Paris champagne Duval-Leroy)
Bernard Burtschy (RVF, journalist, statistician)
Stéphane Derenoncourt (consultant, producer)
Jean-Pierre Giraud (Tonnellerie Taransaud)
Olivier Poussier (Lenôtre, Best Wine Sommelier of the World 2000)
Laurent Vialette (merchant, Journalist, RVF expert)
François Wilhelm (Trimbach)

Germany
Otto Geisel (merchant, restaurateur, hotelier)
Joël Payne (journalist, co-author Guide GaultMillau)

Italy
Gabriele Bava (merchant, producer)
Ernesto Gentili (Guido Espresso)
Moreno Petrini (producer)
Marco Reitano (sommelier, La Pergola, Roma)
Luciano Sandrone (producer Barolo)
Enzo Vizzari (editor, Guida Espresso)

Luxemburg
Abi Duhr (journalist, producer, professor)

Netherlands
Ronald de Groot (editor, journalist, Pers-Wijn)

Portugal
Dirk van der Niepoort (producer)

Spain
Victor de la Serna (journalist El Mundo, producer)

Sweden
Andreas Larsson (Best Sommelier of the World 2007)

Switzerland
Steve Bettschen (merchant)
Jacques Perrin (merchant, journalist)
Patrick Regamey (great wine lover, producer)
Christian Roger (manager Vino&Finanza)
Roberto Schneuwly (merchant)

United Kingdom
Neil Beckett (editor, journalist, The World of Fine Wine)
Anthony Hanson (Christie's wine department)

USA
Sean Perry (Perry Enterprises)
Kevin Shin (great wine lover)
Wilfred Van Gorp (MD, great wine lover)
Kelly Walker (great wine lover)

ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
Alain Dutournier (France) restaurateur ** Michelin
Laurence Mortet (France) producer, Gevrey-Chambertin
Jacques Thorel (France) restaurateur ** Michelin
Derek Lee & Dr N K Yong (Singapore)
Giampaolo Motta (Italy) producer, La Massa (Tuscany)
Claudio Tipa (Italy) producer, Colle Massari – Grattamacco

THE PRINCIPLES OF THE EUROPEAN GRAND JURY (GJE)

Principle No. 1: Tasting similar kinds of wines by a European panel
The first rule of GJE is to choose a selection of ± 34 wines having a similarity between them: same variety of vine, same qualification or classification, or the same sub-region.
As our approach favors a panel of tasters as opposed to individual judgments, it is also necessary to ensure that this panel is representative of various points of view that could result from diverse professions whether or not directly connected to wine. We have therefore selected a group of tasters including restaurateurs, oenologists, producers, wine waiters, journalists and great wine lovers, chosen from all over Europe.
30 tasters have the status of 'Permanent Member'. Other tasters join them, chosen in terms of their reputation, of which some are producers and journalists (but without their notes being taken into account in the calculation of results). In total, the Grand Jury sessions therefore bring together some thirty high caliber tasters.

Principle No. 2: Choice of wines
The GJE buys or exchanges the wines, which assures its independence. Some wines are offered by the Partners or Friends of the GJE.

Principle No. 3: Blind tasting
2 sessions of 3 hours per day with a maximum selection of ± 32 wines corresponds to what a good taster can reasonably taste per day.

Principle No. 4: Classifications and comments
In order to evaluate the points of view of everyone within the same approach, the simplest solution is that of a scoring system out of 100 points, accompanied by comments.
A complex statistical tool, developed by Bernard Burtschy, himself a permanent taster and Professor of Statistics in one of the Parisian postgraduate universities, corrects the possible variations and discrepancies in classifications between the tasters.

Principle No. 5: Global approach of the wine by GJE
All GJE's tasters have a similar and coherent point of view about wine: the expression of the soil, controlled yields, rigorous care of the vines, wine making and husbandry of the highest standard. But each brings his particular sensitivity and the fruit of his experiences.

The very high standard of these tasters, who accept with considerable humility the overall blind results which come out of each tasting, and who obviously know how to reveal the traps posed by wines that are too 'technical', give the GJE's tastings a unique authenticity as we claim.

Practical organization
The service and anonymity of the wines takes place under the control of a legal authority.
For each session, the numbered glasses are first filled before the entry into the taster's room. Strict silence is observed and the tasters do not speak to each other.
All steps are taken to ensure that the wines are served at the right temperature. The serving is done in Spiegelau glasses “Authentis” collection, Partner of GJE.
Each taster starts the tasting with the wine bearing the same number as his table, to avoid the appreciation of the first wine being biased. At each session, Me Baracchino draws lots to establish the order in which the wines will be served.
At the end of the tasting, a debriefing makes it possible to gather the fresh reactions of the tasters, still without them knowing the names of the wines (announced after the discussion concerning them).
Following a complex statistical calculation, based on the computer program specially developed for these tastings of great wines by Bernard Burtschy, the detailed results of the sessions of the GJE are available in the section "tasting reports" on this website. You have to be registered to download the reports.

Financing

A non-profit making association, the Grand Jury is financed by Partners, Sponsors and various Suppliers.

Development

Modest in its claims though rigorous in its methods, the European Grand Jury of Wine (GJE) wishes to see itself above all as an alternative to the individual notes of the important acknowledged critics, particularly the English and Americans.
The wine lover has indeed the legitimate right to question himself concerning the influence of the label in any tasting, everyone knowing that in the privacy of an office, notes resulting from 'officially' blind tastings can be changed according to a more or less established reputation.
Everyone is free to watch us at work and very often producers whose wines are being tasted come and participate in our sessions and can bear witness as to the seriousness of our methodology.

Not only does the specific statistical model, developed by Bernard Burtschy (Professor Emeritus at the National Telecommunications School), make possible a rigorous presentation of the results, but to this must be added significant information about the coherence of the jury and, lately, a classification of the quality/price ratio, an essential criterion for the wine lover concerned about his budget.
One of the bases of our action may be summarized as follows:
12 tasters cannot, at the same time, at the same moment, be mistaken in their judgment of the same wine.
The corollary is that we are never afraid to start the same tasting again, if need be, after an interval of several days. We wager that, with the difference of a few ranks, the first will remain first and the last will remain last (and we have already proved it).
Lastly, and it is our final objective regarding wine lovers, Bernard Burtschy has developed a new tool for analyzing the quality/price ratio. The information thus communicated to the wine lover will enable him to optimize his purchases and therefore to build up over time a cellar having real value.

Indeed, we have neither the means, nor the time, to taste all the wines in a classification or in a region: moreover, who could seriously undertake this? We pay considerable attention to always offering wines of modest origins (but already known to professionals) to the shrewdness of our tasters, by the side of wines of reputed or classified growths.
How many times do we have to tell the wine lover that a Sociando-Mallet at 30 euros is easily, very easily, worth classified growths at double the price?
And, in addition, that it ages remarkably well (see our tasting of the 1982 vintage in Las Vegas).

How many times do we have to put a first growth Denis Mortet against the great wines of other producers before it is finally understood that in Burgundy, man comes before any other consideration: it is the wine maker who makes the wine and not the soil on its own.

We would not want anyone to be mistaken about our intentions: we are far from being simply iconoclasts! We know pertinently (and we say it again regularly in the case of Bordeaux) that, given time, some wines take years to bloom and sometimes find it difficult to show their true potential when still young. So with us as with other critics, we simply compare the notes given to early growths with the notes for the same wines some years later: there are some considerable differences!
Our tastings of old vintages quite obviously demonstrate this phenomenon: who could, in 1972, approach a La Tâche? Who can, for 1982 Bordeaux, approach the premiers crus, if not a superb Pichon Comtesse and an exceptional Sociando-Mallet? Who can, in the 1964 vintage, equal a sublime Haut-Brion where there is nothing lacking in offering you a unique emotion.
We should understand that the wine lover must retain an open mind, by providing himself with a critically argued tool. It is the aim of the GJE to bring him information that will be useful in building up his cellar.
We have never lost sight of the fact that, before all else, the work of the wine grower must be respected, the one who takes meticulous care of his vine stock, respecting the fruit, not crushing it in the cellar through rough if not dubious handling. To pull down a product, however imperfect, in a few seconds is not our role. The critic, whether of films, cookery, literature or wine must know how to combine humility, competence and rigor by never forgetting that it is men who judge other men with, like them, their defects and their qualities.
Last Updated ( mardi, 14 août 2007 )
Copyright 2005 Grand Jury Européen. All rights reserved.
Création Anka Studio Luxembourg ankat@pt.lu.